[quote="Raef"]Hm, I would definitely disagree with some of the cast about Deathly Hallows pt. 1's trueness to the book. I've read all the books numerous times, seen the movies numerous times, and I would say this movie is easily much more true to the book than any of the others (post Columbus of course). I personally thought this movie was so good that it made up for the 4th, 5th, and 6th movies. Maybe because Michael Gambon wasn't in it ruining Dumbledore's character, or that Emma Watson has gotten her eyebrow acting under control. On top of it all, this was the first movie where I noticed J.K. Rowlings role as producer. Not sure if this is the first one she co-produced or I just might not have noticed it before.
Just my 2 cents.
Something I'm frequently flamed for is my fondness for the 3rd movie, prisoner of Azkaban. In my opinion, the only movie that had a creatively stylized interpretation, and fantastic cinematography which made up its storyline detail deficiencies. Alfonso Cuarón was the director of that one.[/quote]
OMG Respect for you has skyrocketed, both for the trueness to the book remark, and Azkaban fandom! I love the wand sounds in azkaban, the lighting, and of course as you said the cinematography
Story wise, there were small parts left out, but they were trivial in comparrison, this film story wise was much much better than say the order of the phoenix, I mean.. Longest book, smallest film.